SEARCH  

NEWS

2010.10.06:11:36:28
Moto.wieszjak.pl - nowy wortal motoryzacyjny na rynku stawia na porady
Nowa witryna oferuje użytkownikom przegląd wiadomości z rynku motoryzacyjnego, testy aut nowych i używanych, liczne porady prawne i eksploatacyjne dla kierowców, moto-forum, niezbędnik oraz newsletter dla zmotoryzowanych.

 

159726494223_554460007834Oren Laadan
From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@xxxxxxxxx A checkpointed task image may specify a value for the DABR (Data Access Breakpoint Register). The restart code needs to validate this value before making any c

 
147121294538_510260007734Li Zefan
From: Dan Smith <danms@xxxxxxxxxx Implement the s390 arch-specific checkpoint/restart helpers. This is on top of Oren Laadans c/r code. With these, I am able to checkpoint and restart simple p

 
152326984685_564060007667Li Zefan
From: Dan Smith <danms@xxxxxxxxxx Implement the s390 arch-specific checkpoint/restart helpers. This is on top of Oren Laadans c/r code. With these, I am able to checkpoint and restart simple p

 
182727334181_535360007308Andrew Morton
Quoting Li Zefan (lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx): While walking through the whitelist, if the DEV_ALL item is found, no more check is needed. Right, because the DEV_ALL item always has all permissions.

 
125320624977_505860007357Andrew Morton
Quoting Li Zefan (lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx): While walking through the whitelist, if the DEV_ALL item is found, no more check is needed. Right, because the DEV_ALL item always has all permissions.

 
179125484005_501460007979Chris R Jones
Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:47:16 +0800 Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: While walking through the whitelist, if the DEV_ALL item is found, no more check is neede

 
184825624107_538560007988Chris R Jones
Andrew Morton wrote: On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:47:16 +0800 Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: While walking through the whitelist, if the DEV_ALL item is found, no more check is neede

 
111921884686_580460007611Serge E Hallyn
Quoting Chris R. Jones (chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx): One more question for the experts: Is there any roadmap out there for when we can see containers support in kernels for the major distributions

 
147026544343_565160007215Serge E Hallyn
Quoting Chris R. Jones (chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx): One more question for the experts: Is there any roadmap out there for when we can see containers support in kernels for the major distributions

 
195922614278_593660007228Serge E Hallyn
On s390, all tasks have READ_IMPLIES_EXEC set in current- personality, which causes the restart process to map things like the stack and heap as executable. During the restart process, remove this b

 
129221104777_529860007868Serge E Hallyn
On s390, all tasks have READ_IMPLIES_EXEC set in current- personality, which causes the restart process to map things like the stack and heap as executable. During the restart process, remove this b

 
127629724430_538460007094Oren Laadan
Serge E. Hallyn wrote: Quoting Dan Smith (danms@xxxxxxxxxx): On s390, all tasks have READ_IMPLIES_EXEC set in current- personality, which causes the restart process to map things like the s

 
137124764282_505760007110Oren Laadan
Serge E. Hallyn wrote: Quoting Dan Smith (danms@xxxxxxxxxx): On s390, all tasks have READ_IMPLIES_EXEC set in current- personality, which causes the restart process to map things like the s

 
166827504765_501160007772Oren Laadan
OL In fact, if elsewhere we restore current- personality of the task, OL then unless we move it to cr_read_mm(), it will overwrite it :( Should we move it or just remove RIE before we start the re

 
122723604033_550560007353Serge E Hallyn
Dan, Now after the rework of the patchset, its probably a good time to add support for this. Im unsure if the personality can affect other restore actions that take place elsewhere If so, probably

 
173425884463_551060007588Ryo Tsuruta
Ok, applied. Serge E. Hallyn wrote: Make x86 support depend on it (for now). Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@xxxxxxxxxx --- arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 ins

 
137721624560_580860007918Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Hi all, Im pleased to announce that the new dm-ioband RPM package (v1.12.0) has been released at: rel="nofollow" sourceforge.net/apps/trac/ioband/wiki/dm-ioband sourceforge.net/apps/trac/iob

 
190229184393_518460007673Sukadev Bhattiprolu
Suka, can you please post the entire test program so I can try to reproduce it here ? thanks, Oren. Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: Tried this with v14-rc2. This is probably not implemented yet...

 
129426434423_505960007824Sukadev Bhattiprolu
I just posted v14-rc3 which includes the c/r of restart-blocks. That should improve the situation. However, depending on which syscalls one uses, process may still seem "stuck" after rest

 
183128824184_586560007479Mark Ryden
Hi, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: Oren Laadan [orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: | | I just posted v14-rc3 which includes the c/r of restart-blocks. | That should improve the situation. | | H

 
121721204067_568160007953Mark Ryden
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 01:00:53PM +0300, Mark Ryden wrote: Hello, I am back to it and I just want to ask if there are any news with sysfs tagged directory support patch. Is it merged now ?

 
126820074115_582960007661Oren Laadan
Quoting Mark Ryden (markryde@xxxxxxxxx): Hello, I am sorry to hear that it is not merged yet.I hoped to try to start a project with network namespaces. Sysfs tagged directories are not support

 
174627174579_513960007554Serge E Hallyn
Checkpoint of sysvipc shared memory is performed in two steps: first, the entire ipc namespace is dumped as a whole by iterating through all shm objects and dumping the contents of each one. The shme

 
181221964197_523560007852Oren Laadan
Serge E. Hallyn wrote: Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): ... int cr_write_ipc(struct cr_ctx *ctx, struct nsproxy *nsproxy) { - return 0; + return cr_write_ipc_shm(ctx,

 
105820854734_524260007119Oren Laadan
During restart, an ipc shared region may have SHM_DEST, indicating that it has been originally deleted (while still active). In this case the task of deleting the region after restoring it is postpon

 
172221674240_579060007871Oren Laadan
Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): -int ipc_addid(struct ipc_ids* ids, struct kern_ipc_perm* new, int size) +int +ipc_addid(struct ipc_ids *ids, struct kern_ipc_perm *new, int size, i

 
174321164879_585860007694Oren Laadan
Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): Serge E. Hallyn wrote: Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx): -int ipc_addid(struct ipc_ids* ids, struct kern_ipc_perm* new, int si

 
151926914410_509760007312Oren Laadan
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:32:31AM -0400, Oren Laadan wrote: Signed-off-by: Oren Laadan <orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx The description is empty and this patch is rather pointless without 7/7. Any reas

 
165226424508_584960007763Matt Helsley
Like chekcpoint, restart of sysvipc shared memory is also performed in two steps: first, the entire ipc namespace is restored as a whole, by restoring each shm object read from the checkpoint image.

 
170129354849_543460007799Dave Hansen
Add a interface to postpone an action until the end of the entire checkpoint or restart operation. This is useful when during the scan of tasks an operation cannot be performed in place, to avoid the

 
155429004966_579460007813Oren Laadan
Dave Hansen wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 01:32 -0400, Oren Laadan wrote: Add a interface to postpone an action until the end of the entire checkpoint or restart operation. This is useful whe

 
166524314930_554360007874Oren Laadan
These two are used in the next patch when calling vfs_read/write() Signed-off-by: Oren Laadan <orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- fs/read_write.c | 10 ---------- include/linux/fs.h | 10 ++++++++

 
123628074564_564760007394Serge E Hallyn
If ext2/3/4 is compiled as a kernel module, apply this patch to successfully compile this c/r patchset. Oren. diff --git a/checkpoint/ckpt_file.c b/checkpoint/ckpt_file.c index 0fe68bf..df6bb3d 10

 
195925564035_546660007912Oren Laadan
A minor comment and a nit. Oren Laadan [orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: | From d832bfba9a50789fbfadf8486fbdfbd8b498a9ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 | From: Dave Hansen <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Date

 
122821054847_507660007024Oren Laadan
A minor comment and a nit. Oren Laadan [orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: | From d832bfba9a50789fbfadf8486fbdfbd8b498a9ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 | From: Dave Hansen <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Date

 
187520934924_584160007612Oren Laadan
Infrastructure to handle objects that may be shared and referenced by multiple tasks or other objects, e..g open files, memory address space etc. The state of shared objects is saved once. On the fi

 
165425524043_558360007331Oren Laadan
Infrastructure to handle objects that may be shared and referenced by multiple tasks or other objects, e..g open files, memory address space etc. The state of shared objects is saved once. On the fi

 
145623314138_502060007042Oren Laadan
Create trivial sys_checkpoint and sys_restore system calls. They will enable to checkpoint and restart an entire container, to and from a checkpoint image file descriptor. The syscalls take a file d

 
141529364599_545060007004Oren Laadan
Create trivial sys_checkpoint and sys_restore system calls. They will enable to checkpoint and restart an entire container, to and from a checkpoint image file descriptor. The syscalls take a file d

 
136226304110_520960007650Oren Laadan
Minor comment: Oren Laadan [orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: | From 26e7a012d3ff04d64a59e629f2427dfa2b49792b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 | From: Oren Laadan <orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Date: Mon, 30 Mar

 
123325824744_515760007631Oren Laadan
Minor comment: Oren Laadan [orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: | From 26e7a012d3ff04d64a59e629f2427dfa2b49792b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 | From: Oren Laadan <orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Date: Mon, 30 Mar

 
177020764183_581360007277Oren Laadan
A few minor comments. Oren Laadan [orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: | From 6f0a1dc1db8fdac766b00f90e04e06a5827af459 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 | From: Oren Laadan <orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Date: Mon,

 
114321154609_528260007586Oren Laadan
A few minor comments. Oren Laadan [orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: | From 6f0a1dc1db8fdac766b00f90e04e06a5827af459 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 | From: Oren Laadan <orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Date: Mon,

 
132525514522_592460007924Oren Laadan
Just a nit: Oren Laadan [orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: | From 6f5483b085b1fb675a8445c65ddbeb7b38187865 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 | From: Oren Laadan <orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2

 
192923644554_503860007260Oren Laadan
Just a nit: Oren Laadan [orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: | From 6f5483b085b1fb675a8445c65ddbeb7b38187865 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 | From: Oren Laadan <orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2

 
168828074843_543260007265Oren Laadan
One comment below. Oren Laadan [orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: | From eed3f074ed035c93eb49d05cc1491ee680956906 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 | From: Oren Laadan <orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Date: Mon, 30

 
106227334341_524560007000Oren Laadan
From: Dave Hansen <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx This marks ext[234] as being checkpointable. There will be many more to do this to, but this is a start. Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave@xxxxxxxx

 
152326894115_513160007251Oren Laadan
Couple of nits: Oren Laadan [orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: | From f5dec38baa6a2cc2a88783db3a9afd676821d293 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 | From: Oren Laadan <orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Date: Mon, 30 Mar

 
171822964803_523960007805Oren Laadan
Minor comment. Oren Laadan [orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote: | From 7bb32901eb8cefba38bd06bea8a1630ac0dd5051 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 | From: Oren Laadan <orenl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Date: Mon, 30 Mar

 
116221484168_571760007741Serge E Hallyn
A pipe is essentially a double-headed inode with a buffer attached to it. We checkpoint the pipe buffer only once, as soon as we hit one side of the pipe, regardless whether it is read- or write- end